Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Halu Oleo Law Review

Articles

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Halu Oleo Law Review: Volume 6 Issue 2

Humanity Values on Reconciliation in Criminal Law: Indonesian Criminal Law Renewal Perspective

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v6i2.1
Submitted
September 28, 2022
Published
2022-09-28

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to explain humanitarian values on reconciliation of criminal law in the reform of the Penal Code. Reconciliation is a tool to accomplish a problem or law cases that occur in the private and public fields. Currently, reconciliation has been often used to resolve criminal cases, because this solution is more oriented toward human values. The research is library studies, so secondary data (journals, legal documents, and literature) is the main data. The result of the research shows that there are two approaches to discussing human values of reconciliation. Firstly, the values approach shows that reconciliation as consensus - discussion is an admission of guilt in the form of apology, which is containing equality values, rationality, frankness, righteousness, and transparency. Secondly, the policy approach indicates that consensus – the discussion has flexible value and is proportional.

References

  1. Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017.
  2. Buddeberg, Eva. “Kant on the Role of Religion for Moral Progress.” Kantian Review 24, No. 3 (September 9, 2019): 335–357. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1369415419000165/type/journal_article.
  3. Chiba, Masaji. “Other Phases of Legal Pluralism in the Contemporary World.” Ratio Juris 11, No. 3 (September 1998): 228–245. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9337.00088.
  4. Costa, Fernanda Doz. “Pobreza e direitos humanos: da mera retórica às obrigações jurídicas - um estudo crítico sobre diferentes modelos conceituais.” Sur. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos 5, No. 9 (Desember 2008): 88–119. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-64452008000200006&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
  5. Dixon, Bill. “Development, crime prevention and social policy in post-apartheid South Africa.” Critical Social Policy 26, No. 1 (Februari 2006): 169–191. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261018306059770.
  6. Dong, Baomin, Peter H. Egger, dan Yibei Guo. “Is poverty the mother of crime? Evidence from homicide rates in China.” Diedit oleh Shihe Fu. PLOS ONE 15, No. 5 (Mei 18, 2020): 1–22. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233034.
  7. Dutwin, D. “The Character of Deliberation: Equality, Argument, and the Formation of Public Opinion.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15, No. 3 (September 1, 2003): 239–264. https://academic.oup.com/ijpor/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ijpor/15.3.239.
  8. Frese, Michael. “Cultural Practices, Norms, and Values.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 46, No. 10 (November 23, 2015): 1327–1330. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022022115600267.
  9. Garner, Bryan A., dan Henry Campbell Black. Black’s Law Dictionary. Ninth Edit. St. Paul, Minn.: Thomson West, 2009.
  10. Hartanto, S, I S Utari, dan R Arifin. “Implementation of Penal Mediation in the Perspective of Progressive Law (Study at the Semarang City Police Department).” IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of … 4, No. 2 (2019): 161–188.
  11. Herman, Herman. “Upaya Non Penal dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Halu Oleo Law Review 2, No. 1 (Juni 6, 2018): 306. http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/holrev/article/view/4192.
  12. Karvatska, Svitlana. “Socio-Historical Factors of Law Perception in ‘Living Law’ Concept by Eugen Ehrlich.” Erlìhìvsʹkij žurnal 1 (Desember 25, 2017): 42–51. http://ehrlichsjournal.chnu.edu.ua/index.php?journal=ehrlichsjournal&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=10.
  13. Koentjaraningrat. Bunga Rampai: Kebudayaan, Mentalitas & Pembangunan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2004.
  14. Kuswardani, dan Fajar Ilhamsyah. “Penal Mediation in the Tourist Accident Case.” International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 52, No. 1 (2020): 164–172.
  15. Kuswardani, Kuswardani, dan Gilang Kartiko. “Asas Kesalahan Dalam Hukum Pidana Pilar Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Seminar Nasional Online & Call for Papers (2020): 11–20.
  16. Lacey, Nicola, dan Hanna Pickard. “To Blame or to Forgive? Reconciling Punishment and Forgiveness in Criminal Justice.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (April 2, 2015): 665–696. https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ojls/gqv012.
  17. Maculan, Elena, dan Alicia Gil Gil. “The Rationale and Purposes of Criminal Law and Punishment in Transitional Contexts.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40, No. 1 (Maret 1, 2020): 132–157. https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article/40/1/132/5716712.
  18. Mangku, Dewa Gede. “Politik Hukum Pancasila dalam Paradigma Nilai-Nilai Sosial Kultural Masyarakat Indonesia.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 9, No. 1 (Juli 21, 2014). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pandecta/article/view/2856.
  19. Perrottet, C. “Immanuel Kant’s Perpetual Peace: The New World Order of Critical Philosophy.” The Journal of Global Development and Peace (2009): 4–30.
  20. Rahman, Yozi Aulia, dan Affandi Dwi Prasetyo. “Economics and Crime Rates in Indonesia.” JEJAK 11, No. 2 (September 10, 2018): 401–412. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jejak/article/view/16060.
  21. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice (Original Edition). Development Policy Review. Oxford Paperbacks 301 301. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  22. Sapoelete, Rudy, Muhadar Muhadar, Otto Yudianto, dan Budiarsih Budiarsih. “The Concept of Penal Mediation for the Crime of Medical Negligence in Realizing Legal Protection for Medical Personnel and Patients or Their Families.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 8, No. 2 (Februari 2, 2021): 147. https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/2406.
  23. Sellis, Paul. “The Place of Reconcillation in Transitional Justice.” International Centre of Transitional Justice, No. June (2017): 1–16.
  24. Sitepu, Sudirman. “Penanggulangan Kejahatan melalui Kebijakan Kriminal.” Syiar Hukum 8, No. 3 (2006): 325–335.
  25. Starkweather, David A. “The Retributive Theory of ‘Just Deserts’ and Victim Participation in Plea Bargaining.” Indiana Law Journal 67, No. 3 (1992): 853–878.
  26. Suwignyo, Agus. “Gotong royong as social citizenship in Indonesia, 1940s to 1990s.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 50, No. 3 (September 12, 2019): 387–408. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022463419000407/type/journal_article.
  27. United Nations. Report of the Thirteenth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice. Vol. A/CONF.222, 2015.
  28. Wang, Tay-sheng. “Translation, Codification, and Transplantation of Foreign Laws in Taiwan.” Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 25, No. 2 (2016): 307–329.
  29. Wilujeng, M. R. Hukum Adat dalam Perkembangannya. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, 2020.